Search results
Sergio Osmeña Sr. CCLH (Spanish: [ˈseɾxjo osˈmeɲa], Tagalog: [ˈsɛɾhjo ˈosmɛɲa]; Chinese: 吳文釗; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: Gô͘ Bûn-chiau; September 9, 1878 – October 19, 1961) was a Filipino lawyer and politician who served as the fourth President of the Philippines from 1944 to 1946. He was Vice President under Manuel L. Quezon.
Apr 23, 2024 · Sergio Osmeña (born Sept. 9, 1878, Cebu City, Phil.—died Oct. 19, 1961, Manila) was a Filipino statesman, founder of the Nationalist Party (Partido Nacionalista) and president of the Philippines from 1944 to 1946. Sergio Osmeña. Osmeña received a law degree from the University of Santo Tomás, Manila, in 1903.
Jun 11, 2018 · Sergio Osmeña (1878-1961) was the second president of the Philippine Commonwealth and a distinguished statesman. He led the country in its initial stage of political maturation by his honest and selfless devotion to public service. Sergio Osmeña was born in Cebu on the island of Cebu on Sept. 9, 1878.
Mar 14, 2024 · Sergio Osmeña played a vital role in the fight for Philippine independence and is considered one of the most influential leaders in Philippine history. Introduction to Sergio Osmeña’s Presidency. Sergio Osmeña’s presidency began in 1944, following the death of President Manuel L. Quezon.
Oct 19, 1961. Pres. Sergio Osmeña served as the fourth president of the Philippines from 1944 to 1946 upon Pres. Quezon's untimely death in 1944. He also served as the first vice president of the Philippine Commonwealth having won the 1935 Presidential and Vice Presidential election.
(9 Setyembre 1878–19 Oktubre 1961) Nanungkulang pangulo ng Komonwelt si Sergio S. Osmeña (Ser·hi·yó Is Os·mén·ya) nang mamatay si Pangulong Manuel L. Quezon sa Estados Unidos at hanggang mapalaya ang Filipinas sa wakas ng Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig.
of the Revolution in the pivotal case of Sergio Osmena (1878-1961) who, as the most important Filipino leader of the post-revolutionary years, was regarded as "the architect of Philippine nationalism." I shall then consider how the dominant interpretation of the Revolution, as illustrated in the Os?
