Search results
Compared to del Pilar and Lopez Jaena, Rizal typically had the most comprehensive tripartite view of Philippine history. His was also the most consistent in negating the self-imposed Spanish "civilizing mission" in Filipinas.
The history of the Philippines, as viewed by the Spaniards, as a bipartite. They considered it that the Indios were being barbaric and pagan before the colonialization, and the second would be the civilizing influence of Spanish in terms of polity and religion.
The opposing concept of the view explained earlier is the Tripartite View of History. If refers to the idea if the colonial subjects against their colonizers to deny the nobility to colonialism.
They are Graciano Lopez Jaena, Marcelo H. Del Pilar, and Dr. Jose Rizal who brought the tripartite view of the Philippine history and were given great significance in the article written by Zeus Salazar.
The document summarizes Zeus Salazar's article about the tripartite view of Philippine history according to three key propagandists - Graciano Lopez Jaena, Marcelo H. Del Pilar, and Jose Rizal.
Zeus A . Salazar. University of the Philippines Diliman, Department of History, Department Member. Follow. Research Interests: Bagong Kasaysayan, Pantayong Pananaw, Philippine History, Philippine prehistory, Philippine Babaylan Studies, and Babaylanes. About: Ama ng Pantayong Pananaw. Papers. August 29-30, 1896: Bonifacio's Battle for Maynila.
Sep 16, 2008 · These works include: Leandro Fernandez, A Brief History of the Philippines, Boston: Ginn and Company, 1919; Philippine History Stories, New York: World Book Company, 1925; The Philippine Republic, New York: Columbia University, 1926; and The Story of Our Country, Manila: Philippine Book Company, 1927.
