Search results
MANG INASAL PHILIPPINES, INC., Petitioner. vs. IFP MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. VELASCO, JR., J.: Before us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court of the Resolutions dated June 10, 2015 1 and December 2, 2015 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 139020. The Facts.
Before us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court of the Resolutions dated June 10, 2015 1 and December 2, 2015 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 139020. Respondent IFP Manufacturing Corporation is a local manufacturer of snacks and beverages.
Mar 12, 2024 · Mang Inasal Philippines, Inc. vs. IFP Manufacturing Corporation. ### Facts: The case involves a dispute over trademark registration between Mang Inasal Philippines, Inc. (Petitioner) and IFP Manufacturing Corporation (Respondent).
Jun 19, 2017 · This case involves a dispute over the registration of the mark "OK Hotdog Inasal Cheese Hotdog Flavor Mark" applied for by respondent IFP Manufacturing Corporation. Petitioner Mang Inasal Philippines opposed the registration, arguing that it is too similar to their own "Mang Inasal" mark and would likely cause confusion among the public.
MANG INASAL PHILIPPINES v. IFP MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, GR No. 221717, 2017-06-19. Facts: IFP Manufacturing Corporation is a local manufacturer of snacks and beverages.
June 19, 2017. Philippines. Mang Inasal Philippines, Inc. vs. IFP Manufacturing Corporation, G.R. No. 221717. June 19, 2017. Date of Judgment June 19, 2017. Issuing Authority Supreme Court. Level of the Issuing Authority Final Instance. Type of Procedure Judicial (Administrative) Subject Matter Trademarks.
Jun 19, 2017 · Mang Inasal vs IFP Manufacturing, GR 221717, June 19, 2017 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This document summarizes an intellectual property case between Mang Inasal Philippines, Inc. and IFP Manufacturing Corporation regarding trademark registration.
