Search results
6. Both sentences are grammatically correct. The difference is that hadn't is is in the past tense while haven't is in the present tense. EDIT (due to your edit) In context, haven't is the grammatically correct sentence. Hadn't would not make sense as the order of events ought to be preserved. Nevertheless, hadn't would make sense if something ...
22. You may use either. Strictly speaking, your choice should be governed by the context in which you are speaking of your schedule. If you are speaking about your activity during those two weeks, you should use the past form: In the last two weeks I didn't have much time: I was at the office for ten or twelve hours a day, including weekends.
May 18, 2012 · For example, I haven't is more common than I've not. You may prefer the former to avoid standing out. Grammatical context: You may wish to choose a contraction based on the grammatical context in which it appears. For example, contracting I have not into I haven't is correct when the have is non-auxiliary in function (e.g. "I haven't a clue").
Oct 2, 2012 · Now it's clear how to negate: "I haven't got any money." This solution is still very widespread in British English. Note that similar phenomena have occurred in other languages as well. E.g. Spanish tener (original meaning hold) now fills the gap that was left when haber (have) became an auxiliary only.
British idioms, in order of my own preference would be 1. I haven't slept since Monday. 2. I haven't had any sleep since Monday. Sometimes people will say I can't get any sleep... (with all the noise from downstairs).. It would be unusual to hear the past tense "got" in this context. As a very general rule "get, got and gotten" tend to be ...
"They haven't started yet" is the negative of the perfect tense, "They have started." As the article puts it, it is "used for describing a past action's effect on the present." It more or less requires that the idea gets extended in time, which "yet" does nicely.
Nov 14, 2018 · It's equally correct to say "I haven't been here before..." and "I wasn't here before..." They have slightly different connotations, in that "wasn't here before" might be specific to a the single time you were near that place last, but they're more-or-less equivalent. As an example, if you were in Chicago, IL, USA for the first time, you might ...
May 12, 2013 · "Haven't heard anything from you in a while." or "Haven't heard anything from you for a while." No difference in meaning in this case, at least, not to my knowledge in American English, and not in my idiolect. But there would in these cases: I'll give this to you in a while. [Not now, but maybe tonight or next week.] I'll give this to you for a ...
Apr 15, 2013 · both are correct to say and will convey the same meaning. They will convey the same meaning in a negative sentence; but in ages and other durational phrases with in (in weeks/months/years/a coon's age/donkey's years) are Negative Polarity Items and can't occur outside the scope of a negative trigger. E.g, I've known him for ages/years/a long ...
Sep 19, 2019 · 2. Short answer: 1 is common in American English; 2 is common in British English; 3 is uncommon in British and American English; 4 is common in British and American English. Tag questions (American English), or question tags (British English) are often taught as simple rules, but their use is actually rather complicated.
