Search results
Philippine Jurisprudence - Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Seagate Technology
Feb 11, 2005 · On appeal, CIR asserted that by virtue of the PEZA registration alone of STP, the latter is not subject to the VAT. According to CIR, STP's sales transactions intended for export are not exempt. ISSUE:
Jul 28, 2019 · Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Seagate Technology (Philippines) G.R. NO. 153866, February 11, 2005. FACTS: Respondent, Seagate Technology is registered with the Philippine Export Zone Authority (PEZA) under Presidential Decree No. 66, as amended, to engage in the manufacture of recording components primarily used in computers ...
Feb 14, 2024 · Facts: Seagate Technology (Philippines), a resident foreign corporation duly registered to operate in the Special Economic Zone in Naga, Cebu, and a VAT-registered entity, filed an administrative claim for a refund of VAT input taxes amounting to P28,369,226.38 with the Revenue District Office No. 83, Talisay, Cebu on October 4, 1999.
CIR v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY , GR NO. 153866, 2005-02-11. Facts: As jointly stipulated by the parties, the pertinent facts x x x involved in this case are as follows:
CIR v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, GR NO. 153866, 2005-02-11. Facts: [Respondent] is a resident foreign corporation duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission to do business in the Philippines.
Feb 11, 2005 · This document is a summary of a court case between the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (petitioner) and Seagate Technology (Philippines) (respondent). The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Court of Tax Appeals granting the respondent's claim for a value-added tax (VAT) refund totaling 12,122,922.66 pesos.
