Search results
Petitioners also charge that the session was hastily adjourned at 3:40 p.m. on November 21, 1996 and the bill certified by Speaker Jose De Venecia to prevent petitioner Rep. Arroyo from formally challenging the existence of a quorum and asking for a reconsideration.
Aug 14, 1997 · After a roll call, the Chair (Deputy Speaker Raul Daza) declared the presence of a quorum.1 Rep. Arroyo appealed the ruling of the Chair, but his motion was defeated when put to a vote. The interpellation of the sponsor thereafter proceeded. Petitioner Rep. Joker Arroyo registered to interpellate.
by Natasha Kaye. JOKER P. ARROYO v. JOSE DE VENECIA, GR No. 127255, 1997-08-14. Facts: This is a petition for certiorari and/or prohibition challenging the validity of Republic Act No. 8240, which amends certain provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code by imposing so-called "sin taxes"
Jun 26, 1998 · JOKER P. ARROYO v. JOSE DE VENECIA +. RESOLUTION. 353 Phil. 623. MENDOZA, J.: Petitioners seek a rehearing and reconsideration of the Court's decision dismissing their petition for certiorari and prohibition.
Aug 14, 1997 · Arroyo vs. De Venecia G.R. No. 127255, August 14, 1997. Sunday, January 25, 2009 Posted by Coffeeholic Writes. Labels: Case Digests , Political Law. Facts: A petition was filed challenging the validity of RA 8240, which amends certain provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code.
Aug 14, 1997 · In its decision, the Court found that: 1) the petitioner did not properly address the Chair of the House before asking a question, as required by House rules, so the Chair did not ignore the petitioner; 2) the petitioner's question was not a privileged question or point of order under House rules; and 3) there was no basis to invalidate the law ...
The thrust of petitioners arguments in attacking the validity of the law is merely with respect to the fact that Rep. Joker Arroyo was effectively prevented from invoking the question of quorum and not that the substance thereof offends constitutional standards.
