Search results
G.R. No. L-19650 September 29, 1966. CALTEX (PHILIPPINES), INC., petitioner-appellee, vs. ENRICO PALOMAR, in his capacity as THE POSTMASTER GENERAL, respondent-appellant. Office of the Solicitor General for respondent and appellant. Ross, Selph and Carrascoso for petitioner and appellee.
Apr 27, 2024 · The Acting Postmaster General, Enrico Palomar, denied the request, categorizing the contest as a lottery or gift enterprise, thereby barring its promotion through mail based on sections 1954 (a), 1982, and 1983 of the Revised Administrative Code.
Sep 22, 2018 · Petition for declaratory relief against Postmaster Palomar Facts. Caltex initiated a promotional scheme entitled “Caltex Hooded Pump Contest” where contenders would guess the amount of liters contained in a covered pump.
CALTEX INC. v. ENRICO PALOMAR, GR No. L-19650, 1966-09-29. Facts: In the year 1960 the Caltex (Philippines) Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Caltex) conceived and laid the ground-work for a promotional scheme calculated to drum up patronage for its oil products.
EN BANC. G.R. No. L-12986 March 31, 1966. THE SPOUSES BERNABE AFRICA and SOLEDAD C. AFRICA, and the HEIRS OF DOMINGA ONG, petitioners-appellants, vs. CALTEX (PHIL.), INC., MATEO BOQUIREN and THE COURT OF APPEALS, respondents-appellees. Ross, Selph, Carrascoso and Janda for the respondents.
This case involves a dispute between Caltex Philippines and the Post Master General over whether Caltex's promotional "Hooded Pump Contest" violates Philippine postal laws. Caltex sought permission from postal authorities to publicize the contest through mailings.
1.Caltex v. Palomar Digest - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. (1) This case involves a petition for declaratory relief filed by Caltex Philippines against the Postmaster General regarding Caltex's "Hooded Pump Contest" promotion.
CALTEX (PHILIPPINES), INC., petitioner-appellee, vs. ENRICO PALOMAR, in his capacity as THE POSTMASTER GENERAL, respondent-appellant. Office of the Solicitor General for respondent and appellant. Ross, Selph and Carrascoso for petitioner and appellee.
Apr 27, 2024 · The trial court ruled in favor of Caltex, leading to Palomar’s appeal to the Philippine Supreme Court. **Issues:** Whether the petition for declaratory relief presented a sufficient cause of action. Whether the “Caltex Hooded Pump Contest” violated the Postal Law by being a lottery or gift enterprise.
Mar 21, 2016 · CALTEX (PHILIPPINES), INC vs. ENRICO PALOMAR, in his capacity as THE POSTMASTER GENERAL FACTS: In 1960, Caltex launched their "Caltex Hooded Pump Contest", which called for participants to estimate the actual number of liters a hooded gas pump at each Caltex station will dispense during a specified period.Participants were neither ...
