Search results
- Dictionarysig·nif·i·cant/səɡˈnifək(ə)nt/
adjective
- 1. sufficiently great or important to be worthy of attention; noteworthy: "a significant increase in sales" Similar Opposite
- 2. having a particular meaning; indicative of something: "in times of stress her dreams seemed to her especially significant"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
The major changes involve a significant amount of preparation and work with complex situations or major expenses. Examples: Implementation / upgrade of a corporate business application; Moving a computer room; Significant Changes: Significant changes involve preparation and work, evaluation, authorization and planning for change. Examples:
One way of viewing significant risk would be something which would have more impact than the control measures necessary to prevent it; so the risk arising from a wet floor (stf, lost-time injury, legal fees, management time all divided by likelihood) would cost more than the act of drying the floor, in this view a wet floor is a significant risk.
In the ever-growing complexity of dependencies amongst products at the build and run time level, there is the challenge of managing increasingly separate items that must work together upon release. This is where the concepts, disciplines, roles, and responsibilities of release management help. Release management focuses on both the engineering disciplines that must bring a specific project ...
Neither are defined in statute (could be wrong) however, Holt suggests (and I paraphrase) SSOW - a formal procedure to identify hazard's, assess risks and identifies work methods to eliminate and reduce risks MS - the key feature is that they provide a sequence for carrying out a specific task and are typically sued for demolition work, asbestos removal, steel erection and other similar tasks ...
Mar 4, 2023 · FWIW, in our internal reporting we have 'accident' for something that causes any injury to an individual, 'significant incidents' and 'other minor incidents', but the latter two categories are not defined with any legalese and it's up to the investigating individual whether they categorise it as something significant or something minor.
the only thing I disagree with is the 'it cannot be written' statement as our lads in high risk areas do write down all significant situations as an on going action as they work and stop work where real significant hazards are discovered etc which have not been accounted for previously Regards B
The errors that people commit have significant impact on our projects. First, because we expect errors, we plan for them by including reviews, audits and tests as part of our project plan. This time and expense is simply part of what we do on projects because we know that people make mistakes.
I don't think that just beacuse a hazard causes an injury it automatically reveals itself as any more significant. I really think it depends on your industry and the relative significance of a risk. When you've got the major risks that commonly injure staff under control, then the lesser risks do become more significant, but until then, ignore ...
HSE define a near miss as a typr of incident: incident: near miss: an event not causing harm, but has the potential to cause injury or ill health (in this guidance, the term near miss will include dangerous occurrences) undesired circumstance: a set of conditions or circumstances that have the potential to cause injury or
But, of course, that requires using := with the problems described above. Another alternative is the following simple caching scheme. First, I define a function cache which automatically caches a macro's value the first time it is evaluated and retrieves it from the cache for each subsequent attempt to retrieve it.
