Search results
Aug 26, 2022 · Sorted by: λ λ or ε ε means the empty string, so this transition can be used without consuming any symbol from the input, i.e., it is a spontaneous transition over the input; λ λ or ε ε means "empty stack"; λ λ or ε ε means pop from stack. Cite.
2. In wikipedia NFA-ε transition function defined as follows Δ: Q × (Σ ∪ {ε}) → P(Q) Δ: Q × (Σ ∪ {ε}) → P (Q), where Σ Σ is an alphabet and ε ε - empty string. I don't understand the meaning of ε ε in this context. Assuming ε ε means a sequence of symbols with length of zero, as per definition. Alphabet Σ Σ is a set ...
Oct 11, 2020 · The regular expressions (a + b)∗ (a + b) ∗ and (ab)∗ (a b) ∗ represent languages according to the semantics of regular expressions. Formally, the language L[r] L [r] corresponding to a regular expression r r is defined as follows: L[∅] = ∅ L [∅] = ∅. L[ϵ] = ϵ L [ϵ] = ϵ. L[σ] = σ L [σ] = σ for σ ∈ Σ σ ∈ Σ. L[r1 ...
Sep 6, 2017 · Why is the non-deterministic finite automaton called non-deterministic while we define the transitions for inputs. Well, even though there are multiple and epsilon transitions, they are defined which means that the machine is deterministic for those transitions. Which means it's deterministic. finite-automata. nondeterminism.
finite automata, transducers and; transition systems. Some of the notions flying around differ mostly in motivation; some arose from language and/or computability theory, others from computer architecture. Note that you can also change several paradigms to get automata that are, arguably, still finite-state automata, for instance. Büchi automata,
Dec 7, 2017 · Pushdown automata, for instance, are automata that have an infinite set of configurations (these have a finite number of states, but the reality is that these should be thought as 'infinite automata'). In the same vein, there ar other examples of infinite automata for which the state space is infinite, but with a lot of structure.
Mar 12, 2014 · Yes, you are correct computers are deterministic automate. Non-deterministic models are more useful for theoretical purpose, sometime the deterministic solution is not as obvious to the definition (or say problem statement) and so little hard to find solution. Then one approach is that first design a non-deterministic model that may be ...
Sep 9, 2016 · 14. Every time you are in a state which has a ϵ transition, it means you automatically are in BOTH states, to simplify this to you: If the string is ϵ then your automata ends both in q0 and q1. If your string is '0' it'll be again in q0 and q1. If your string is '1', it'll be only in q2, because if you look from the point of q0, you have a '1 ...
Once the machine enters a dead state, there is no way for it to reach an accepting state. So a trap state can be final or non final, since both can have either no transitions defined or have transitions for every symbol happening to itself. A final state cannot be a dead state, as we can read $\epsilon$ and stay in the same state, which is ...
Oct 27, 2016 · 4. I am trying to understand how many states should be there in a Finite Automata which does not accept anything. I thought it to be containing only one non-final state, the starting state, with all transitions going to itself. But one of my teachers mentioned that the set of final states cannot be empty. Does that mean there will be two states ...
