Search results
Jul 30, 2021 · The Condonation Doctrine, also known as the Aguinaldo Doctrine, provides that a re-elected public official cannot be removed for an administrative misconduct committed during a prior term, […]
Santos,52 hence also known as Aguinaldo doctrine, states that an elected public official cannot be removed for administrative misconduct committed during a prior term, since his re-election to office operates as a condonation of the officer's previous misconduct to the extent of cutting off the right to remove him therefor.53
He basically argues: his alleged illegal acts were committed sometime between 2013 and 2014. He was re-elected as Vice-Mayor of the Municipality of Vinzons, Camarines Norte in the 2016 national and local elections, thus, he was already exonerated of the charges per the "Aguinaldo doctrine."
The Court later reiterated its Pascual ruling in the 1992 case of Aguinaldo v. Hon. Santos77 but it clarified that the condonation doctrine, or the Aguinaldo doctrine, as it was thereafter known, cannot be applied to criminal acts which the reelected official may have committed during his or her previous term.78 Moreover, in Atty. Salumbides ...
Aug 4, 2021 · The Condonation Doctrine, also known as the Aguinaldo Doctrine, provides that a re-elected public official cannot be removed for an administrative misconduct committed during a prior term, since his re-election to office effectively operates as a condonation of his past misconduct to the extent of abolishing the right to remove him ...
Submitting separate, independent short lists for each vacancy is the only way for the JBC to observe the constitutional standards of (a) one list for every vacancy, and (b) choosing candidates of competence, independence, probity, and integrity for every such vacancy.
Nov 8, 2021 · The Supreme Court elucidates the applicability of the Condonation Doctrine, otherwise known as the Aguinaldo Doctrine, following its abandonment in Carpio-Morales vs. Binay in 2016. On whether or not the doctrine is still applicable in the consolidated cases (GR No. 237330, Madreo v. Bayron; GR No. 237579, Ombudsman v.
Apr 25, 2015 · The Aguinaldo condonation legal doctrine referred to by the Chief Justice during the oral arguments in the Binay case is borrowed from American jurisprudence. In the United States, it dates back to 1887.
To nullify G.R. No. 94115 (Aguinaldo doctrine) as it contravenes the Public Accountability [provisions] of 1987 Constitution and violates Republic Act [No.] 6713 and Republic Act [No.] 7160; and
Finally, it rejected petitioner's invocation of the condonation doctrine as jurisprudentially established in Aguinaldo v. Santos [31] since the same had already been abandoned in the 2015 case of Carpio Morales v. Binay, Jr. (Carpio Morales). [32]
