Search results
The Complaint, 7 docketed as Civil Case No. 1192-BG, named as defendants herein petitioner Raytheon International, Inc. as well as BMSI and RUST, the two corporations impleaded in the earlier labor case.
In its Answer, 8 petitioner alleged that contrary to respondent's claim, it was a foreign corporation duly licensed to do business in the Philippines and denied entering into any arrangement with respondent or paying the latter any sum of money.
May 8, 2024 · This resolution was upheld by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on November 26, 1997. On January 8, 1999, Rouzie filed a civil case (No. 1192-BG) for damages against Raytheon International, Inc. (alongside BMSI and RUST) in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bauang, La Union, Philippines.
Summary of Voting. Title. Raytheon International, Inc., vs., Stockton W. Rouzie, Jr. Ponente. J. Tinga. Docket No. G.R. No. 162894. No. of Participating Justices.
[Raytheon International, Inc. v. Rouzie, Jr. (G.R. No. 162894, Feb. 26, 2008)]. Further, the Supreme Court explained that “[t]he rule on limited review embodies the policy of efficiency and the protection of party expectations, as well as respecting the jurisdiction of other states.”
RAYTHEON INTERNATIONAL v. STOCKTON W. ROUZIE, GR No. 162894, 2008-02-26. Facts: Brand Marine Services, Inc. (BMSI), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, United States of America, and respondent Stockton W. Rouzie, Jr., an American citizen, entered into a contract whereby BMSI hired... respondent ...
The CA affirmed the RTC's denial of Raytheon's motion to dismiss on grounds of failure to state a cause of action and forum non conveniens. The RTC had jurisdiction over the case filed by Rouzie against Raytheon for damages arising from an alleged breach of contract.
