Search results
Dec 21, 2021 · Two teams of EDD students from Philippines and China participated in a modified Oxford-Oregon classroom debate on December 11, 2021. The debate was part of a course on moral philosophy applied in education and focused on the right to education for learners in conflict with the law.
Sep 10, 2014 · The document discusses different types of debates, including the Lincoln-Douglas debate, rebuttal debate, and Oregon-Oxford debate. It explains the typical structure and flow of an Oregon-Oxford debate, which involves three speakers from each side presenting arguments and rebuttals.
The Oxford-style debate format offers opposing sides of a topic to intelligently exchange arguments and rebuttals: an “affirmative” team supports convincing arguments to the motion, while a “negative” team refutes the points made by the affirmative team.
May 5, 2016 · This document outlines the format and rules for an Oxford-style debate. It discusses the traditional debate structure used in various settings which involves two opposing sides - affirmative and negative. Each side has three speakers who give constructive speeches and rebuttals.
Feb 1, 2020 · The Oxford-Oregon debates comprise three basic parts: the Constructive Speeches, Interpellations , and Rebuttals. 1. Constructive Speech. Constructive speech refers to the presentation of arguments, proofs, and evidence by the first to third speakers of both teams.
Dec 21, 2021 · Two teams of EDD students from Philippines and China participated in a modified Oxford-Oregon classroom debate on the proposition that learners in conflict with the law should have education in an inclusive setting. The debate was part of a course on moral philosophy applied in education at the University of Southeastern Philippines.
The debate on the Implementation of Same Sex Marriage in the Philippines using an Oxford Oregon type.
