Search results
ANTONIO M. SERRANO, Petitioner, vs. Gallant MARITIME SERVICES, INC. and MARLOW NAVIGATION CO., INC., Respondents. D E C I S I O N. AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.: For decades, the toil of solitary migrants has helped lift entire families and communities out of poverty.
Petitioner was hired by Gallant Maritime Services, Inc. and Marlow Navigation Co., Ltd. (respondents) under a Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA)-approved Contract of Employment with the following terms and conditions:
Dec 4, 2017 · Serrano vs. Gallant Maritime Services G.R. No. 167614 March 24, 2009 Non-impairment of Contract Clause, OFW Employment Contract. December 4, 2017. FACTS: For Antonio Serrano, a Filipino seafarer, the last clause in the 5 th paragraph of Section 10, Republic Act (R.A.)
Mar 24, 2009 · For Antonio Serrano (petitioner), a Filipino seafarer, the last clause in the 5th paragraph of Section 10, Republic Act (R.A.) No. 8042, violates the OFWs’ constitutional rights in that it impairs the terms of their contract, deprives them of equal protection and denies them due process.
Jun 4, 2024 · Antonio Serrano, a Filipino seafarer, was employed by Gallant Maritime Services, Inc., and Marlow Navigation Co., Ltd. under a POEA-approved twelve-month contract as a Chief Officer.
Mar 24, 2009 · Antonio Serrano (serrano for brevity) was a Filipino sea fairer employed as Chief Officer by Gallant Maritime Services Inc and Marlow Navigation Co., Inc (respondents for brevity) under a 12- month contract with Basic Monthly Salary of US$1400.
This case concerns Antonio Serrano, a Filipino seafarer who was hired by Gallant Maritime Services, Inc. and Marlow Navigation Co., Ltd. under an employment contract for 12 months as Chief Officer. He was forced to accept a downgraded position of Second Officer and promised to be made Chief Officer by the end of April 1998, which did not happen.
