Search results
On 22 March 1988, petitioner Ayer Productions came to this Court by a Petition for certiorari dated 21 March 1988 with an urgent prayer for Preliminary Injunction or Restraining Order, which petition was docketed as G.R. No. L-82380.
Jun 25, 2014 · Petitioner McElroy an Australian film maker, and his movie production company, Ayer Productions, envisioned, sometime in 1987, for commercial viewing and for Philippine and international release, the historic peaceful struggle of the Filipinos at EDSA.
AYER PRODUCTIONS PTY. LTD. v. IGNACIO M. CAPULONG, GR No. 82380, 1988-04-29. Facts: Petitioner Hal McElroy, an Australian film maker, and his movie production company, petitioner Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. ("Ayer Productions"), [1] envisioned, sometime in 1987, the filming for commercial viewing and for Philippine and... international release ...
Feb 4, 2024 · Ayer Productions and Hal McElroy separately contested the RTC’s decision, alleging it was an unconstitutional prior restraint on their freedom of expression. The Supreme Court consolidated these petitions in March 1988, partially lifting the TRO to allow filming parts not referring to Enrile.
The Supreme Court ruled that the production of the motion picture "The Four Day Revolution" by Ayer Productions did not constitute an unlawful intrusion on the right to privacy of Senator Juan Ponce Enrile.
May 18, 1990 · On 22 March 1988, petitioner Ayer Productions came to this Court by a Petition for C ertiorari dated 21 March 1988 with an urgent prayer for Preliminary Injunction or Restraining Order, which petition was docketed as G.R. No. L-82380.
The Supreme Court ruled that the film production company Ayer Productions did not require Juan Ponce Enrile's consent to depict him in their film "The Four Day Revolution" about the 1986 People Power Revolution in the Philippines.
