Search results
He basically argues: his alleged illegal acts were committed sometime between 2013 and 2014. He was re-elected as Vice-Mayor of the Municipality of Vinzons, Camarines Norte in the 2016 national and local elections, thus, he was already exonerated of the charges per the "Aguinaldo doctrine."
Santos,52 hence also known as Aguinaldo doctrine, states that an elected public official cannot be removed for administrative misconduct committed during a prior term, since his re-election to office operates as a condonation of the officer's previous misconduct to the extent of cutting off the right to remove him therefor.53
Jul 30, 2021 · The Condonation Doctrine, also known as the Aguinaldo Doctrine, provides that a re-elected public official cannot be removed for an administrative misconduct committed during a prior term, […]
The Court later reiterated its Pascual ruling in the 1992 case of Aguinaldo v. Hon. Santos77 but it clarified that the condonation doctrine, or the Aguinaldo doctrine, as it was thereafter known, cannot be applied to criminal acts which the reelected official may have committed during his or her previous term.78 Moreover, in Atty. Salumbides ...
Nov 10, 2015 · It is basic procedural law that a Rule 65 petition is based on errors of jurisdiction, and not errors of judgment to which the classifications of ( a) questions of fact, ( b) questions of law, or ( c) questions of mixed fact and law, relate to.
Aug 4, 2021 · The Condonation Doctrine, also known as the Aguinaldo Doctrine, provides that a re-elected public official cannot be removed for an administrative misconduct committed during a prior term, since his re-election to office effectively operates as a condonation of his past misconduct to the extent of abolishing the right to remove him therefor ...
To nullify G.R. No. 94115 (Aguinaldo doctrine) as it contravenes the Public Accountability [provisions] of 1987 Constitution and violates Republic Act [No.] 6713 and Republic Act [No.] 7160; and
Apr 25, 2015 · The Aguinaldo condonation legal doctrine referred to by the Chief Justice during the oral arguments in the Binay case is borrowed from American jurisprudence. In the United States, it dates back to 1887.
Finally, it rejected petitioner's invocation of the condonation doctrine as jurisprudentially established in Aguinaldo v. Santos [31] since the same had already been abandoned in the 2015 case of Carpio Morales v. Binay, Jr. (Carpio Morales). [32]
The condonation doctrine was abandoned on April 12, 2016, when Carpio Morales v. Court of Appeals[1] attained finality. Nonetheless, despite its abandonment, the condonation doctrine can still apply to pending administrative cases [2] provided that the reelection is also before the abandonment.
