Search results
Sep 11, 1998 · G.R. No. 109406 - REMEDIOS T. BLAQUERA, ET AL. vs. ANGEL C. ALCALA, ET AL. PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. Home > ChanRobles Virtual Law Library > Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > EN BANC. G.R. No. 109406 September 11, 1998.
REMEDIOS T. BLAQUERA v. ANGEL C. ALCALA, GR No. 109406, 1998-09-11. Facts: These are cases for certiorari and prohibition, challenging the constitutionality and validity of Administrative Order Nos. 29 and 268.
Nevertheless, our pronouncement in Blaquera v. Alcala 25 supports petitioners’ position on the refund of the benefits they received. In Blaquera, the officials and employees of several government departments and agencies were paid incentive benefits which the COA disallowed on the ground that Administrative Order No. 29 dated 19 January 1993 ...
BLAQUERA v ALCALA GR No. 109406/ Facts: On Feb. 21, 1992, then Pres. Aquino issued AO 268 which granted each official and employee of the government the productivity incentive benefits in a maximum amount equivalent to 30% of the employee’s one month basic salary but which amount not be less than P2, 000.
Blaquera vs Alcala, 295 SCRA 411 Case Digest (Administrative Law) - Free download as (.rtf), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.
In the 1998 case of Blaquera v. Alcala, [60] (Blaquera), the Court relied on good faith to excuse the return of the disallowed amounts.
Sep 11, 1998 · Full text of the latest decisions of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. Featured as a public service on the World Wide Web by The Law Firm of Chan Robles and Associates - Philippines.
This document summarizes a court case between Blaquerra vs Alcala regarding Administrative Orders (AO) 29 and 268 issued by the President that limited productivity incentive benefits for government employees.
Blaquera v. Hon. Alcala 1 (Blaquera), the pioneer case law on good faith and the obligation to reimburse in disallowance cases, was a case on the constitutionality (via petitions for certiorari and prohibition) of Administrative Order (AO) Nos. 29 and 268 on various grounds, which directed the concerned government agencies that paid out producti...
Nevertheless, our pronouncement in Blaquera v. Alcala supports petitioners' position on the. refund of the benefits they received. In Blaquera, the officials and employees of several government departments and agencies were paid incentive benefits which the COA disallowed on the ground that Administrative Order No. 29 dated 19 January 1993 ...
