Search results
Mar 27, 2019 · DECISION. Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] (Petition) under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner Rogelio Logrosa (petitioner Logrosa) against respondents Spouses Cleofe Azares (Cleofe) and Cesar Azares (Cesar) (collectively, respondents Sps.
CAGUIOA, J.: Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari1 (Petition) under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner Rogelio Logrosa (petitioner Logrosa) against respondents Spouses Cleofe Azares (Cleofe) and Cesar Azares (Cesar) (collectively, respondents Sps.
1) Petitioner Logrosa claimed he was a co-owner of eight parcels of land based on titles listing him as such along with respondents. 2) A notarized deed of absolute sale from 1987 showed petitioner and respondents collectively purchased the properties from the original owner.
Mar 27, 2019 · The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled in favor of petitioner Rogelio Logrosa in his petition for review of a Court of Appeals decision denying his appeal of a trial court decision dismissing his complaint for partition of properties that he claimed to co-own with respondents.
Mar 27, 2019 · Azares, G.R. No. 217611, Mar 27, 2019 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.
Mar 27, 2019 · Case Digest: ROGELIO LOGROSA v. SPS. CLEOFE AND CESAR AZARES. Digest not created. You do not seem to have any annotations for this case. Creating your own digest is easy. Simply highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES. Try it now with this case . Lawyerly - Create case digests by highlighting text as facts, issues, ruling or principles.
DECISION CAGUIOA, J: Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] (Petition) under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner Rogelio Logrosa (petitioner Logrosa) against respondents Spouses Cleofe Azares (Cleofe) and Cesar Azares (Cesar) (collectively, respondents Sps.
