Search results
A collateral attack, also called an indirect attack, is a challenge on the validity of a prior judgment through a new case rather than by a direct appeal . Examples include habeas corpus petitions and claims that a prior judgment was invalid after the opposing party cites it for strategic advantage in a new case.
A collateral attack, in other words, is an attempt to avoid the binding effect of a judgment in order to obtain specific relief that the judgment currently impedes.
A collateral attack is a legal challenge to a judgment or conviction brought in a proceeding other than a direct appeal. This strategy seeks to undermine or overturn the original judgment through indirect means, typically by questioning the court's jurisdiction or the fairness of the proceedings that led to the judgment.
An attempt to impeach or overturn a judgment rendered in a judicial proceeding, made in a proceeding other than within the original action or an appeal from it. A defendant may make a collateral attack on a judgment entered against him or her in some instances.
Feb 7, 2022 · A collateral attack, in other words, is an attempt to avoid the binding effect of a judgment in order to obtain specific relief that the judgment currently impedes.
A collateral attack, also known as an indirect attack, is a legal challenge to the validity of a previous court decision through a new case instead of a direct appeal. This means that a party is trying to prove that a previous judgment was invalid by bringing up new evidence or arguments in a different case.
n. a legal action to challenge a ruling in another case. For example, Joe Parenti has been ordered to pay child support in a divorce case, but he then files another lawsuit trying to prove a claim that he is not the father of the child. A "direct attack" would have been to raise the issue of paterni...
