Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. In a letter-complaint dated August 26, 1985, petitioner 20th Century Fox Film Corporation through counsel sought the National Bureau of Investigation's (NBI) assistance in the conduct of searches and seizures in connection with the latter's anti-film piracy campaign.

  2. The case of 20th Century Fox Film Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, et al ., 164 SCRA 655 (August 19, 1988) (hereinafter 20th Century Fox) was inexistent in December of 1987 when Search Warrant 87-053 was issued by the lower court.

  3. This Court, in 20th Century Fox Film Corp. vs. Court of Appeals (164 SCRA 655) has already laid down the rule that a basic requirement for the validity of search warrants, in cases of this nature, is the presentation of the master tapes of the copyrighted films from which pirated films are supposed to have been copied.

  4. Dec 1, 2020 · 20 th Century Fox vs CA. G.R. Nos. 76649-51 . Facts: Petitioner 20th Century Fox Film Corporation through counsel sought the NBI assistance in the conduct of searches and seizures in connection with the latter's anti-film piracy campaign.

  5. Mar 20, 2012 · Petitioner 20 th Century Fox Film Corporation sought the assistance of the NBI in conducting searches and seizures in connection with the NBI’s anti-film piracy campaign. Petitioner alleged that certain videotape outlets all over Metro Manila are engaged in the unauthorized sale and renting out of copyrighted films in violation of ...

  6. 20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION v. CA, GR Nos. 76649-51, 1988-08-19. Facts: eti­tioner 20th Century Fox Film Corporation... sought the. NBI... assistance in the conduct of searches and seizures in connection with the latter's anti-film piracy campaign.

  7. The constitutional right against illegal searches and seizures protects citizens against unwarranted invasion of privacy. For a valid search, probable cause requires personal knowledge by witnesses of facts that an offense was committed in the place to be searched.