Search results
Nov 21, 2023 · Res Ipsa Loquitur, meaning ''the thing speaks for itself'' in Latin, is a principle in tort law that allows plaintiffs to meet burden of proof with circumstantial evidence.The Res Ipsa doctrine ...
Mar 15, 2024 · Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase that translates to "the thing that speaks for itself." In personal injury law, this concept arises when the very occurrence of an accident suggests that someone was at fault, even if there's no direct evidence pointing to the defendant's negligence. Trying to understand personal injury law can be a tall order ...
res ipsa lo· qui· tur. variants also res ipsa loquitor. -ˈlō-kwə-tər. : a doctrine or rule of evidence in tort law that permits an inference or presumption that a defendant was negligent in an accident injuring the plaintiff on the basis of circumstantial evidence if the accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence ...
Res ipsa loquitur definition: the rule that an injury is due to the defendant's negligence when that which caused it was under their control or management and the injury would not have happened had proper management been observed..
A Latin term meaning "the thing speaks for itself", which is a doctrine that infers negligence from the nature of the accident, when evidence regarding the behaviour of the defendant is lacking. For example, the elements of a tort (that is, duty of care, breach and causation) are inferred from an injurious circumstance that would not normally occur without negligence.
Res Ipsa Loquitur [Latin, The thing speaks for itself.] A rebuttable presumption or inference that the defendant was negligent, which arises upon proof that the instrumentality or condition causing the injury was in the defendant's exclusive control and that the accident was one that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of Negligence.
Latin for "the thing speaks for itself," a doctrine of law that one is presumed to be negligent if he/she/it had exclusive control of whatever caused the injury even though there is no specific evidence of an act of negligence, and without negligence the accident would not have happened. Examples: a) a load of bricks on the roof of a building ...
